Why a dedicated brand for this
Most "brand-protection" companies treat domain abuse as one feature among many. The result is predictable: dashboards full of alerts, fewer actual closures than you'd expect, and a constant background grind of typosquats that never quite get suspended. Domain-level abuse rewards specialists. The work is unglamorous — formatting evidence to each registrar's preferred template, knowing which abuse desk needs a notarised affidavit and which one will act on a screenshot, knowing which registry's contract requires action when the registrar refuses — and the difference between a 24-hour suspension and a 24-day suspension is which specialist is doing the typing.
DomainTakedown exists because that specialism deserves its own brand and its own pricing model. We are the team you bring in when the typosquat clock starts ticking and you need somebody who has done this exact step a thousand times.
Who we are
The DomainTakedown team is staffed by registrar abuse-handling engineers, OSINT analysts, an in-house counsel for UDRP and cybersquatting escalations, and an incident manager who owns each case from intake to closeout. Senior staff have backgrounds in CSIRT operations, anti-fraud functions inside major financial-services and e-commerce platforms, and direct abuse-handling work inside registrars. We hire for "filed an abuse complaint that worked" before any other criterion.
Our parent company
78 OVER 37 LIMITED is the private limited company behind DomainTakedown, the kinetic-response brand at takedown.su, the SEO-fraud investigations brand at seo-fraud.su, the public abuse intake at sitereport.su, the umbrella brand-defence programme at brand-protection.su, and the Overload.su domain-takedown service. Each brand specialises in a different request pattern but they share intake, evidence standards and personnel.
Our methodology
- Hashed, time-anchored evidence stored in immutable archives. Every artefact admissible at UDRP day one.
- Parallel outreach to registrar, registry, browser safe-browsing, ad networks, payment processors and mobile-operator abuse desks where SMS lures are involved.
- Continuous monitoring of certificate-transparency feeds for new registrations against your brand pattern, so the next typosquat is on our radar before it lands in your customer's inbox.
- UDRP-ready evidence packs that your trademark counsel can drop straight into a filing without re-doing operational work.
- Re-emergence monitoring after closure — abusers churn domains, and your defence has to churn faster than they do.
What we will not do
We do not perform unauthorised access, denial-of-service or technical retaliation against attacker infrastructure. We do not file fraudulent or speculative abuse complaints. We do not represent both sides of a brand dispute. We do not silence lawful speech, journalism, research or commercial competition. If a case fits any of those patterns, we decline.
Working with us
Engagements are typically structured as either single-case investigations (one domain, one closure report) or as continuous brand-portfolio monitoring with an embedded response retainer. Many clients begin with a single live typosquat to validate the methodology before committing to a programme.
Corporate
DomainTakedown is operated by 78 OVER 37 LIMITED. Correspondence to support@overload.su; written legal correspondence to that address marked "Legal — DomainTakedown". See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.